Rivendell_librarian
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 772
I've just finished reading Patricia Highsmith's first novel, Strangers on a Train. It was written in 1950 and quickly adapted by Hitchcock in 1951, and has been adapted many times since. There are some significant differences both in plot and character between the book and the film. The book is more psychological and somewhat darker. Oddly, "Bruno" in the book is Charles Anthony Bruno and is referred to as Bruno in the book (except for his mother who calls him Charley) whereas Guy Haines in the book is referred to mostly as "Guy". In the film it is Bruno Antony called Bruno and Guy Haines called Guy. The basic idea of two strangers meeting on a train and one of them (Bruno) suggesting they swap murders is the same in both.
In the book, Highsmith lays on hints about Bruno's homosexuality with a trowel and he has a severe drink problem as well. The Hitchcock film is more visual and has an exciting conclusion whereas the novel's ending is more downbeat. I think the film is more satisfying and better constructed but I wouldn't put anyone off reading the book.
In the book, Highsmith lays on hints about Bruno's homosexuality with a trowel and he has a severe drink problem as well. The Hitchcock film is more visual and has an exciting conclusion whereas the novel's ending is more downbeat. I think the film is more satisfying and better constructed but I wouldn't put anyone off reading the book.

