• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Moria: 📔Book vs. Film (analysis and comparison)

"The Balrog made no answer. The fire in it seemed to die, but the darkness grew. It stepped forward slowly on to the bridge, and suddenly it drew itself up to a great height, and it's wings were spread from wall to wall...."
 
Just saying... Tolkien said it....
He also (and first) says the shadow was like wings. At best it's not definitive. But one thing that is definitive is that the Balrog cannot fly, wings or no. If they're literal wings they don't have substance. For my part, I think the Balrog has wings, just not tangible wings that are functional for flight. The wings of the movie creature make no logical sense.
 
Last edited:
Good point-- my agreement remains as this. The Balrog indeed had wings, but could not fly, for it was not as the Great Eagles, and it's form was not designed as such.

Then tell me, how did the Balrog fall, if he had wings? Couldn't he just... fly...
No, this is the point. Penguins in Present-day Middle-Earth have wings, and they can't fly. It is plausible enough, especially since from everything we've seen of Balrog's form, they are far from aerodynamic.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…