• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Second-guessing and Misunderstanding Tolkien

Radaghast said:
Tolkien actually says Gandalf is the only one who had a chance to successfully use the Ring vs. Sauron.

  • The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien, #246
Click to expand...
My understanding was that Gandalf was the only one who could seize control of the Ring, on a fundamental level, from Sauron. i.e. force it's allegiance to change. Galadriel and Elrond could USE it and theoretically keep it from Sauron by generating a powerful enough kingdom to quash Sauron's forces but not seize ownership of the Ring and thus destroy Sauron's connection to it.

I think Tolkien described it as Gandalf being able to wrench it away from Sauron and destroy the Ring's connection to Sauron as thoroughly as if it'd been thrown into the fire. Sauron would lose all of his power, but the things he'd created with the Ring would endure. The Elves (and obviously those of lesser might) could not achieve such a task but could, in theory, destroy Sauron's body a third time which would achieve a similar goal but Sauron would always be able to respawn and his powers wouldn't be broken.
 
No, Gandalf could not change the "allegiance" of the Ring. He would be corrupted as well. Indeed, Tolkien espoused the idea that he would be a worse Dark Lord than Sauron. From the same letter (#246):
I don't rightly understand how this would make him worse than Sauron but I do get that he would be fairly terrible. In D&D terms, his alignment would be '(l)Awful Good'.
 
Because he would make "good" seem "evil".

My understanding of Tolkien's phrasing was that Gandalf could have wrenched control of the Ring from Sauron. In that manner he changes the Ring's allegiance, just not it's "alignment". He couldn't make the Ring "good".
 
As noted, Gandalf is dealt with separately. I take the "especially" as a reference to Elrond's Maiarin heritage.
 

Someone on Quora replied that Bilbo's poem mentions Elwing putting the Silmaril on Eärendil but it doesn't say that she is a bird, though it does say that she comes "flying" to him:
There flying Elwing came to him,

and flame was in the darkness lit;

more bright than light of diamond

the fire upon her carcanet.
The Silmaril she bound on him

and crowned him with the living light
Click to expand...
  • "Many Meetings"
 
Radaghast said:
Someone on Quora replied that Bilbo's poem mentions Elwing putting the Silmaril on Eärendil but it doesn't say that she is a bird, though it does say that she comes "flying" to him:

  • "Many Meetings"
Click to expand...
A fair number of people, I would say the majority of people, don't understand most poetry (and therefore don't like it) because they read it literally.
They do not know how to recognize (never mind use) literary devices such as analogy, hyperbole, onomatopoeia, metaphor, satire, parody etc.
In this case, the phrase "flying to him" was taken literally... Elwing actually flying through the air. And since it is mostly birds that fly, the reader understood it to say Elwing took the form of a bird. At least that is the way I read the original "Bonkers" question.
It's kind of sad.... a lot of lovely imagery is lost to those folks.
 
Deimos said:
So Elwing' s name meant "winged elf"? (seriously...is not "el" associated with the Eldar?)
Click to expand...

Tolkien once wrote (Letters) "Difficult to distinguish "star" and "elf", since they are derivatives of the same basic element EL "star". . . "

Interestingly, in this letter at least (letter 211, 1958), Tolkien writes "Elwing (Elf-foam)", although I'd go with Radaghast's response above. One could say much more about EL, words that hail from it, and Tolkien even offering up internal reasons for "variant" Elf/Star translations of Elendil, for instance.

And then there's the name Elessar . . . but I'll shaddup (for now) 🐾
 
Whatever Morgoth may have known, having been given a part of the abilities of all of his Ainur brethren, the term "slight" definitely did not exist in his dictionary - as written by JRRT. For a "slightly evil Morgoth" you need to read stuff by a different fantasy author, doofus! 😖
 
Morgoth being "slightly evil" is analogous to a person described as "slightly murderous".
Not someone you want to sit next to at a dinner party.

btw, I read this somewhere about degrees of corruption,... kind of sobering:
If you have a barrel of sewage into which you pour a bottle of expensive wine, you have..... a barrel of sewage.
If you have a barrel of expensive wine and you pour a teaspoon of sewage into it, you have..... a barrel of sewage.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Similar threads

  • Question
Was JRR Tolkien his own plagiarist?
Replies
12
Views
761
Wetwang
R
Time according to Tolkien
Replies
0
Views
226
Ricardo
R
Evil women in The Lord of the Rings
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
AaronSecret
The Mythical status of Tolkien's Works
Replies
2
Views
851
Eldacar
D
Tolkien trivia: how deep does your knowledge go?
Replies
5
Views
1K
Amalcarin
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…