"Origins of the
Uruk-hai?" You'll get them, allright, more than you can stomach"
-Ugluk the magnificent, referring to the thread
Uruks vs. Uruk-hai
Sorry about dragging the thread back to topic. In any case, I have to say
Húrin, I don't automatically trust
Tolkien's writings from HoME, most notably his changing ideas on the origins of the
Orcs. The usual
Middle-earth canon (as far as I'm aware) is
The Hobbit,
The Lord of the Rings, and sometimes
The Silmarillion. These works are largely self-consistant, and represent Tolkien's fully conceived designs for Middle-earth. Too often in both
UT and the
HoME series we are presented with several different and conflicting accounts of how things happened, with no clearer idea of the 'truth' than whatever the Professor last wrote. Since they were never published in his life time, we don't know if even his 'latest thoughts' on an issue would have survived another round of consideration. For me the case of the origin of the Orcs is the best example of this. Tolkien went through several phases- stone golems, beasts raised to the levels of speech,
elves, and finally
men. However, in my personal opinion, the origin of orcs from elves is the best of these alternatives, and certainly
the one which is most consistent with the list of 'Canon'.