Congrats on finishing Pilgrim's Progress. I did not read it until I was in my 40s (or was it my 50s....).I finally finished Pilgrim's Progress! It took me WAY too long because I had a couple of big projects that I was working on. I'm currently reading Gulliver's Travels and am hoping to start Pride and Predjudice soon. I'm also looking forward to reading a lot more this summer when I visit my grandma, since there is a library really close to my grandma's house.
Almost a year ago (as you can see by the date of my original post) I began to read this book."The End of Everything: How Wars Descend Into Annihilation" by Victor Davis Hanson
Hunger Games is excellent! I think I managed to make them last about three days the first time I read them.Speaking of action, I've started the Hunger Games series! I started and finished the first book yesterday (after pestering my parents until they agreed to let me read it). I'll probably wait another day before I read Mockingjay, I don't want to overload my brain.
Maybe you were thinking of a different book?there weren't nearly enough explosions, battles or deaths for me
Many years ago I was at a literature festival and the comparison of Austen and the Brontes came up, I stood up and made the point that there's too much about marriage and money in Austen - not so much of the passion on the moors of Heathcliff and Cathy etc. Well it was like I said the Black Death was a good thing or something even worse e.g. here saying PJ is a good director of films. Austen novels are well written with all the semi-colons in the right places but I think you have to be in the right mood for themI've dropped Pride and Prejudice after getting about a quarter of the way through. I just found it kind of boring, I couldn't bring myself to care who married who. I asked my mom and she said it's like that for the rest of the book. I'm not saying it's a bad book, it just isn't for me. Maybe when I'm older I'll find that kind of thing interesting, but right now there weren't nearly enough explosions, battles or deaths for me. Not saying I the only thing I appreciate in books is action, but there has to be some action for me to be interested.
Speaking of action, I've started the Hunger Games series! I started and finished the first book yesterday (after pestering my parents until they agreed to let me read it). I'll probably wait another day before I read Mockingjay, I don't want to overload my brain. I can see why I wasn't allowed to read it earlier, but the author did a pretty good job of not being gory or overly descriptive in a book about teenagers killing each other. I'm thinking of watching the movies, but I'm worried that they might be too gory. Has anybody here watched them? I'm okay with intense stuff when it's in a book (I read 1984 when I was 10 and I was totally fine), but when it's in a movie my tolerance level is kind of low (I had to close my eyes for most of Dune 2).
That, right there.I've dropped Pride and Prejudice after getting about a quarter of the way through. I just found it kind of boring, I couldn't bring myself to care who married who..... Maybe when I'm older I'll find that kind of thing interesting, ...
Speaking of action, I've started the Hunger Games series! I started and finished the first book yesterday (after pestering my parents until they agreed to let me read it). I'll probably wait another day before I read Mockingjay,....
This made me laugh.I recently read Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book and I have to admit I was more than pleasantly surprised by how much better it was than the Disney film which I think I've only seen clips of in the old holiday TV programme Disney Time.
There are more stories. They are more realistic. My favourite was The White Seal about a seal who swims the seas to find a safe place for his fellow seals to breed. I bought a book with beautiful illustrations by Robert Ingpen.
That must be the Texas version.Jane Austin is one of my favorite authors, but I agree she is not for everyone. Especially, if want a lot of action. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies was funny, too, and certainly has its thrills.
Yeah, I've gotten to the third book of The Hunger Games, and I'm not zooming through it like I was during the first book. The story is good, but the writing is... eh.... I'm not sure how to describe it. It's shallow. The sentences are flat. At least there isn't as much romance in the third book as there was in the first two *barf*. I've gotten this far, so I will finish it the series, but really the best book was the first one. Also, I've noticed that when I write I sometimes unintentionally mimic the most recent author I read, and I don't want to start sounding like Suzan Collins.That, right there.
It's an exceptional youngster who can appreciate and enjoy Austen and similar authors of other eras.
This is not a criticism. Many kids read Austen, Bronte Hawthorne, Swift, Faulkner and the like in High School. I did.
Some of those novels you may like, most you just manage to get through them (and write the paper).
But you do remember them, and when you are older, they come back to you both the ones you thought Ok and the ones you wanted to make a bonfire of.
Now, being older, you are ready to re-read the "OK" ones. (And maybe even attempt one or two that escaped the bonfire.)
This is why they have you read them in High School; not for that moment but for later, when, having experienced more of life and love you will truly be able to appreciate them. Had you never been exposed to them in HS, you will have nothing in memory to pique your interest when you are older.
FWIW I tried to read the HG .... it was a slog.... it's a good story, meaning the bones of the story are there, but the writing, the "fleshing out" is mediocre.
I could not (and still cannot) imagine attempting the sequels.
Once you have read good writing mediocre writing is a trial to get through.
Kind of like once you have eaten good food, fast food is ....OK, but not one's first choice, or even second or third.
Still, it is forever true: de gustibus non disputandum est. (About taste, it cannot be argued)
Really, the only book that I wanted to put in a fire was Queen's Shadow because it is an absolute disgrace to Padme Amidala (not that I liked her that much in the first place, but the book makes her just plain awful), and my 9th Grade Chemistry book, because every time I opened that thing my brain felt like it was going to explodeSome of those novels you may like, most you just manage to get through them (and write the paper).
But you do remember them, and when you are older, they come back to you both the ones you thought Ok and the ones you wanted to make a bonfire of.
Now, being older, you are ready to re-read the "OK" ones. (And maybe even attempt one or two that escaped the bonfire.)
Is Queen’s Shadow the one whereReally, the only book that I wanted to put in a fire was Queen's Shadow because it is an absolute disgrace to Padme Amidala (not that I liked her that much in the first place, but the book makes her just plain awful), and my 9th Grade Chemistry book, because every time I opened that thing my brain felt like it was going to explode
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?