• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

What 📔book are you reading right now?

You make not a few salient observations.
Yes the HG author is really not very good. 2/3 of the way through the first book I was skipping a half dozen pages at intervals because the writing was so bad... that was the "slog" part.
And the fact that I could skip al those pages and still follow the story tells you something (not very praiseworthy) about the writing. **

Good to know you got through Hamlet untranslated. It's one thing to use notated editions, even heavily notated. It's quite another to read a translated edition, as you would miss the very thing that makes Shakespeare worth reading.
Austen's works are not romances, altho they do tell stories of people falling in (and out of) love. They are "comedies of manners" . Look up "comedy of manners", as it may help you to appreciate P&P and her other works, when the time comes. (You may also like Emma). That is, her works reflect the best and worst of flawed human nature, which all worthwhile literature does.
And if there are any characters in P&P that are so pathetically, yet hilariously flawed, they are Mrs Bennett (the Mother), Mr Collins (the vicar cousin), and Lady Catherine De Bourgh (Darcy's imperious Aunt).

** Good writing improves your reading comprehension, but it does more. People who read good writing willy-nilly become good writers, even if that was not their intent, if they only read for pleasure.
I have read all kinds of writing. The bad stuff teaches you what to avoid ("If I couldn't stand reading this style of writing, I'm certainly not going to imitate it."). The mediocre stuff trains you, often without you being aware of it, to have a critical eye for writing, i.e what is good, what is bad about a writing style. The good stuff teaches how to write well, engagingly, what works to convey what you want to say (or describe). How often have you been utterly captivated, transported by a single sentence or even just a phrase. Some English bloke named Tolkien was pretty good at doing that. 😉

Another English bloke wrote what I think is one of the most beautiful passages ever penned in English.

Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
As I foretold you, were all spirits and
Are melted into air, into thin air:
And, like the baseless fabric of this vision,
The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
As dreams are made on, and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.

William Shakespeare
From The Tempest, Act 4 Scene 1
 
After mentioning it elsewhere in discussing Jane Austen's Northanger Abbey (NA) , I decided to re-read The Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe.

From Wikipedia: The Mysteries of Udolpho is a quintessential Gothic romance,** replete with incidents of physical and psychological terror: remote crumbling castles, seemingly supernatural events, a brooding, scheming villain and a persecuted heroine.***
.....

Mysteries was written in 1794, thereby predating Austen's first novel Sense and Sensibility (1811) by not quite 20 years.
If you can read the English of a regency period novel you should be able to read Mysteries.
In Austen's NA the heroine, having read Mysteries begins to interpret all "significant" or puzzling happenings through the lens of Radcliffe's Gothic novel with the predictable and often amusing results of characters misunderstanding events and each other.

Getting back to The Mysteries of Udolpho... it is 2 volumes, lots of descriptions of natural settings. Unfortunately there is also a lot of Radcliffe's versifying (poems, odes, sonnets) which had that all been excised by editors would have been an improvement. I skipped reading all the verse the first time around and my following the "mystery" suffered not a whit because of it. Not a few commentators over the decades ( and centuries) have said the same thing.

** "Romance"... not to be confused with a "romantic" as in a love story, altho, to be sure this novel does have a love story integral to the plot.
A Romance in literature is a genre in which several key themes were emphasized: "a reverence for nature and the supernatural, an idealization of the past as a nobler era, a fascination with the exotic and the mysterious, and a celebration of the heroic and the sublime." (Wiki article)
Mysteries has all of it, squared and cubed. 🙂

***Our heroine faints and swoons a lot.... really a lot. 🙄
But one must consider the times and what was universally accepted in the west as the "frailty of the fairer sex".
 
Last edited:
'The Body' by Stephen King. One of my favorite movies (and one of the best King adaptations), Stand By Me, is based on it and I definitely like how close they are to one another.
 
I've just finished a Dostoevsky novel called Humiliated and Insulted (1861) - not one of the bigger novels but not a minor novel either. The narrator is a budding young novelist whose first novel bears a resemblance to Dostoyevsky's first novel: Poor Folk.

It feels like a combination of Dickens and Austen (yes Anglocentric I know) with marriage and money being a key theme and a story that spans the classes from the aristocracy to the very poorest with some risque content e.g. child prostitution. Some of the language is very flowery, especially the airhead young aristocrat, but I think this is meant to be taken as humorous. There have been German, Italian and Russian films but no dramatisation in English afaik.

There is a particularly Dickensian baddie as well.
 




 
I've finished Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, and am halfway through The Chamber of Secrets. And I do agree that the books are most certainly better than the films.

I was quite surprised and amused to find Boomslang skin in Harry Potter, as they're a very real, and very common snake where I live. In fact, at one point, I even had some Boomslang skin that I tanned.
A Boomslang:
 
I recently started reading The Hobbit to my younger sister. I had to drag her through the first few chapters, but now that we've gotten to the bit with the trolls she's really interested. I've told her some about Gollum before, so she's eager for us to get to that part of the book. Also, whenever we come to a song, I play the Clamavi de Profundis version for her, so that she understands better what it must have sounded like.
 
Clamavi de Profundis ...are they not great? I love their Song of Durin
Anyway, how old is your sister?
 
I read The Hobbit to my younger sister recently too, she just loved the part at the start where Bilbo opens the door suddenly and Bifur, Bofur, and Bombur all fall on top of Thorin.
I also tried to read it to my younger brother, but he got bored with it and kept going to sleep or playing with his toys, so i guess I'll have to wait till he's a bit older before I try again.
 
Snake! SNAAAAAAAAKE!!!..... Run away! Run away!
 
She doesn't really like reading herself, she prefers if somebody reads it to her.
By daughters must have been 20 and eight when I read LOTR to them for the first time (twice I think) I had previously read The Hobbit and all the Narnia books (and many others). They were starting to read Harry Potter by then. When the later books came out we had to draw lots in the family to prevent squabbles!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…