The Secret Life of the Mind - a book purporting to help us understand "how our brain thinks, feels, and decides."
Wow, this is a somewhat dense book, sharing what areas of the brain do this and that, citing studies 'proving' this and that', and so forth.
Some intriguing terminology and really decent information to probe, indeed..!!
He's working to keep it at a somewhat basic level - which is a good thing, given Ent's significant and enduring limitations.
But it's going to be fun running all this down..!
Meanwhile, it comes down to "does this, or does this not, impact one way or the other, Ent's own work, study and research into how to think, and whether the mind controls us, or we control our mind."
Is it "all or nothing at all"? Or if it's a mixture of 'controls',' how does that impact Ent's model?
AND, even if the mind itself has certain 'built in mechanisms' for the handling of things, does this nullify our ability to overcome, or at least recognize and compensate, for what the mind is theoretically trying to control outside our awareness?
A primary question: If we can "see" and "know" the mind "does this/these thing(s) in this/these way(s), does that give us the ability to circumvent the mind's controls, or are we truly simply 'at its mercy' in spite of ourselves?
Ent has a perspective at present, of course... but that perspective MUST remain open to challenge and adjustment if there is veracity in alternatives..!
(This is what's called 'growth.')
Currently the author is dealing with 'infant development.' (He has totally ignored the 'learning' that occurs within the womb for some reason. Perhaps because, his focus is on 'impirical evidence' and he's found no studies as yet showing 'impirically' the condition of the infant immediately upon birth - though we know there are biological and
chemical impacts and 'learning' that occur while in the womb.)
Anyway, Ent will shut up about this now. But for anyone interested in thinking and growth, I do believe this work would be worth the read - holding it as 'a more current view' than other older theories it references - and understanding it is, as with any other of the sciences, just 'a more current view.' Tomorrow is an entirely different day.