Barley's All-Time Great Reads
Here as promised, given in the order in which I spotted 'em on my bookshelves, are the
books that have stayed with me through the years:
A Policy of Kindness
Dalai Lama XIV
Reincarnation: The Phoenix Fire
Mystery
Head & Cranston
1. How We Believe
2. Why People Believe Weird Things
3. The Science of Good and
Evil
Michael Shirmer
Beethoven: Impressions By His Contempories
Ed. Sonneck
Beethoven: His Spiritual Development
J.W.N. Sullivan
The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
Julian Jaynes
Autobiography of a Yogi
Paramahansa Yogananda
Memoirs
Hector Berlioz
Evenings in the Orchestra
Hector Berlioz
The Gnostic Gospels
Elaine Pagels
Positive Illusions
Shelley Taylor
Words of Sri Anandamayi Ma
Atmananda
The Spiritual Heritage of India
Swami Prabhavananda
Dreams, Illusions and Other Realities
Wendy O'Flaherty
The Concise Yoga Vaseeshta
Swami Venkateshananda
The I Ching
Tr. Richard Wilhelm
The Varieties of Religious Experience
Wm. James
The
Principles of Psychology
Wm. James
Conversations With Adam and Natasha
R.D. Laing
Facing the Music
Henri Temianka
Dumbth
Steve Allen
The Farther Reaches of Human Nature
A. H. Maslow
Letters from the Earth
Mark Twain
Memories, Dreams, Reflections
C.G. Jung
I and That
Alex Comfort
1. Gestalt Therapy Verbatim
2. In and Out the Garbage Pail
Friederich "Fritz" Perls
1. The Wizard of Oz
2. The Scalawagons of Oz
3. Lucky Bucky in Oz
L. Frank Baum
The writings of JRR
Tolkien
Those who read my posts have heard me say again and again that human beings cannot perceive the existence of things that are beyond the range of our sensoria (including the existence of the "
God" of holy books). The books by Jaynes and James are classic cases in point: We have two absolutely stellar geniuses offering brilliant
concepts about the way the brain and mind work — and they are wrong! They are wrong because they were operating on insufficient data.
This happened very early on with the towering genius Leonardo da Vinci, who proffered an absolutely brilliant thesis on the method by which the eye sees. He was fundamentally wrong. And yet these works still make riveting reading, just to see the display of sheer intellectual brilliance in these
men. My point: we are limited by our physicomental structure. We have limits we cannot transcend. We can extend our knowledge, but whatever we learn must all be filtered through the limits of our mental and physical natures. And no matter how much we learn, it will never extend to the realities that are forever beyond our abilities to perceive in the first place.
Barley