thattolkienlady
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2019
- Messages
- 14
I agree-I first read LoTR, then, CoH, simply because my husband gifted it to me, having come across it at a secondhand bookshop. CoH cemented my love for Tolkien's storytelling and Middle earth history-particularly that of the First Age. Because I so enjoyed CoH, I then went on to the Silmarillion, and continue to study the history of not only Middle earth, but Tolkien's process in bringing it to life.I voted for the Children of HĂčrin because it was more approachable and readable for me. But that is not because I think that the Silmarillion is not a worthwhile read. I loved it. I just think that CoH would be a good initiation into the larger framework of Middle Earth for somebody who has only read the Lord of the Rings. I think so, not only because Christopher Tolkien says so in his forward to the book, but also because I found it a much easier read than the Silmarillion, and because it is smaller in scope, it is a good test for if you would have the patience to delve into the deeper stuff or if you would prefer to remain a Hobbit/LotR only kind of fan.
I agree- there is no comparison. Two completely different works. (I cried when reading the end of CoH. No one could capture that emotion, in my opinion, quite the way Tolkien could.)I also didnât vote, as I also do not think they can be compared.
But now Iâm going to throw you (or some of you) a curve ball.
TĂșrin, respectively his deep roots, may very well be one of the deciding germs that led JRRT to write about Middle-earth at all, as Verlyn Flieger shows (or tries to, but successfully, in my opinion) in her 2015 edited version of JRRTâs âThe Story of Kullervoâ. This is the oldest writing bar none of anything to do with his later legendarium, having been written between 1912 (JRRTâs own â uncertain â estimate) and at the very latest 2014, so while he was still a student at Oxford, before he married Edith, entered the Army, or served at the Battle of the Somme (2016) and never mind his return from France and Edithâs dancing for him, which led to âBeren and LĂșthienâ.
The connection between a story about Kullervo, contained in Finlandâs âNational Epicâ The Kalevala, itself only a compilation from about the mid-19th century, and the story of TĂșrin, had been noted several times. That JRRT actually tried his hand at an adaptation of this original story seems to be something of more recent knowledge. And this version of JRRTâs is very much an intermediate stage (not necessarily at midpoint) between Kalevala and TĂșrin. To exaggerate in both directions, the Kalevala Kullervo might have been slapped with an X rating, while JRRTâs smoothed version would have been closer to an R rating, and by comparison TĂșrin is almost PG-13. As with much of JRRTâs writing, like when comparing âLost Talesâ to the published âSilmarillionâ, many details have changed, but many central fundamentals remain unchanged. Perhaps that is why âThe Children of HĂșrinâ of 2007 (besides TH and LoTR the only other book I also have in a German translation) is so far more in a finished state than the two later books on the âbig threeâ stories of the Sil, âBeren and LĂșthienâ (2017) and âThe Fall of Gondolinâ (2018). The story had been in the most extensive and finished form even in the âNarn I HĂźn HĂșrinâ, covering, with notes and appendix, more than 100 pages in âUnfinished Talesâ.
And last, the ending of the tale, with HĂșrin and Morwen meeting at TĂșrinâs gravestone, and her dying in his arms at sunset, is to me the most moving thing JRRT ever wrote.
I did not vote, as I feel there is no way to compare the two. BUT, I will say that, having read CoH BEFORE The Silmarillion, I kept waiting in vain for some bright spot in the midst of all the misery. In the Silmarillion, at least we see the defeat of Morgoth at long last, reminding us, as Sam Gamgee realized in Mordor :"in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."
