Later Quenta Silmarillion has them. There were no omitting by JRR on them. Believe me I've looked for it in the entire texts.
That still doesn't alter the fact that Galadriel was turned from the most valiant lady of the House of Finwë into the equal of Feanor the second most valiant elf of all time.
And yet ( . . . ). Don't tell me JRR himself omitted the passages about Nerdanel being super cool and awesome. These assumptions have no basis.
I think you are missing what the Summons is here. This is the Eldar and Edain being summoned after the War of Wrath, for pardon and reward respectively, if I am not mistaken.It should be noted that in the 1948 version of Galadriel where she was in Lorien at the time of War of Wrath, it is said "too late she heard the summons of Fionwë". This means the Elves from east of the Misty Mountains did not participate in WoW. They heard the summons too late. (Celeborn and Galadriel were in Beleriand in 1955-1972 versions)
Consistent with what had appeared in print (except the unquoted part where Celeborn is Galadriel's close cousin and a Teleri from Aman, contradicting what had appeared in print).From the 1973 version of Galadriel and Celeborn: "In the years after they did not join in the war against Angband, which they judged to be hopeless under the ban of the Valar and without their aid; and their counsel was to withdraw from Beleriand and to build up a power to the eastward (whence they feared that Morgoth would draw reinforcement), befriending and teaching the Dark Elves and Men of those regions. But such a policy having no hope of acceptance among the Elves of Beleriand, Galadriel and Celeborn departed over Ered Lindon before the end of the First Age"
"Canonically", Galadriel had fled Beleriand:In the 1955-1972 versions, the canon versions, Galadriel and Celeborn were present in Beleriand during the War of Wrath. They never departed over Ered Luin until early Second Age. They were most probably in Balar when Eonwë reached to Hithlum. There was now no reasons for G&C to not fight. Therefore, they must've definitely answered the summons and fought in this war.
Reminder again, that Tolkien (via Galadriel) explicitly states that Galadriel left Beleriand before the fall of Nargothrond in LotR.
I have addressed this already. LotR makes no direct statement to that effect, "author published" has him a Sinda..So if you agree that Galadriel crossed the Mountains in First Age, then you also imply that you agree Celeborn was not a Sinda. In his nandorin version Galadriel crossed the mountains alone and met Celeborn on the other side.
And not in the Second Edition? Almost as though Tolkien thought better of that..Christopher is missing a quote here. For in Appendix B of the first edition it is also stated Celeborn crossed the Mountains in early Second Age. So there's actually three later mentions of Celeborn and Galadriel crossing the Mountains in Second Age published by JRR Tolkien himself.
I am not unaware.In the Nature of Middle-earth there are several quotes that are in line or almost in line with those later author published texts about Celeborn and Galadriel.
And would that be the change Tolkien made from the first edition?
And, as already noted, that may be the 'implication' in LotR, but it is not stated.The only mentions of Galadriel crossing the Mountains in First Age comes from the versions where Celeborn is not a Sinda of Doriath and they hadn't met in Beleriand.
Essentially.And the only mention of Galadriel AND Celeborn crossing the Mountains in First Age comes from Treason of Isengard where Galadriel says "The lord and lady of Lothlorien are accounted wise beyond the measure of the Elves of Middle-earth, and of all who have not passed beyond the Seas. For we have dwelt here since the Mountains were reared and the Sun was young." In the notes Christopher elaborates that in this version Galadriel and Celeborn had both came from Valinor and then came to Lorien in the First Age and became its rulers. This was later discarded when Tolkien decided Celeborn is not from Valinor.
However in last years of his life Tolkien turned Celeborn again into an Elf from Valinor. For years he still went on with the conception that Galadriel and Celeborn only crossed the mountains of Ered Luin in the Second Age. But in last month of his life when he wrote Galadriel was not a rebel, but she and Celeborn came to Middle-earth with their own ship, he wrote that "Galadriel and Celeborn departed over Ered Lindon before the end of the First Age" - UT
However this version from Treason of Isengard, and this 'pure' Galadriel version who didn't join the rebellion, both contradict everything Tolkien ever published during his life.
Are you saying, in other words, it does not tell us whether Elves joined or not?she and Celeborn "did not join in the war against Angband, which they judged to be hopeless under the ban of the Valar and without their aid..."
Then Galadriel advised for a plan B (a plan to create a great alliance by building a power into eastwards and having the entire free people of Middle-earth as allies and befriending East people before Morgoth does), nobody truly listened to her and Celeborn. So it was natural for her wisdom to understand it would be useless for her to go to the North war. She knew it "to be hopeless under the ban of the Valar and without their aid..." - UT
But when Valar decided to send aid there was no hopelessness anymore for the Elves
"Now when first Vingilot was set to sail in the seas of heaven, it rose unlocked for, glittering and bright; and the people of Middle-earth beheld it from afar and wondered, and they took it for a sign, and called it Gil-Estel, the Star of High Hope ... Then the Elves looked up, and despaired no longer; but Morgoth was filled with doubt." - Silmarillion, chapter 24
"Of the march of the host of the Valar to the north of Middle-earth little is said in any tale; for among them went none of those Elves who had dwelt and suffered in the Hither Lands, and who made the histories of those days that still are known; and tidings of these things they only learned long afterwards from their kinsfolk in Aman."
This quote does not imply that no Elves from Middle-earth participated in the War. What it do tell us is that the events of the journey, from Valinor to the battlefields in Middle-earth, were mostly unknown to the Elves of Beleriand and other regions of Middle-earth - since they were already in Middle-earth.
Yet earlier in the passage does it not say that"But at the last Fionwë came up out of the West, and the challenge of his trumpets filled the sky; and he summoned unto him all Elves and Men from Hithlum unto the East; and Beleriand was ablaze with the glory of his arms...The meeting of the hosts of the West and of the North is named the Great Battle, the Battle Terrible, and the War of Wrath." - Lost Road
The later passage in Lost Road seems more relevant.Did Galadriel answer the summons into battle? She had no reasons to do not answer the summons. The only reason she was not present in the Siege of Angband and Bragollach and Nirnaeth was because she "judged to be hopeless under the ban of the Valar and without their aid". But now that the Valar sent aid she and the other Elves "despaired no longer; but Morgoth was filled with doubt."
"Great war comes into Beleriand, and Fionwe summons all Elves, and Dwarves, and Men, and Beasts, and birds to his standards, who do not elect to fight for Morgoth." - Shaping of Middle-earth
Or, Galadriel and Celeborn had not been invented yet, and thus are not particularly relevant to those passages. in light of other "author published" writings which have her leaving Beleriand before the fall of Nargothrond, as well as writings that note only one physical combat (defending her mother's kin at the First Kinslaying) she was involved in.A possibility is that Galadriel literally outright broke character and didn't answer the summons of Fionwe to ride to war against Angband, OR the more likely and logical possibility is that she acted in-character and fought against Morgoth in this war.
Oh dear ...... and it became apparent she was lifting it from ManInTheMoons work here).
Welcome to my world. I might change your statement above in just one small way, truncating it to: "It is pointless to argue."Some times it is apparent it is pointless to argue with people who try to ignore everything you quote.
I got the impression that we are not supposed to talk about religion on this forum, but at least in my circles, I have both had and witnessed many fruitful religious discussions. That said, I agree there are some people with "hardened hearts", as it were, to use religious terminology.Welcome to my world. I might change your statement above in just one small way, truncating it to: "It is pointless to argue."
conversation and discussion is good. but the fact is no amount of presentation of 'facts' will overcome the opinions of many.
It is what I have come to call The Religion of Opinion. And like most "religions", those who hold to it are intractable, in spite of any evidence given.
It is a rare bird indeed... (or elf, or tree, or dwarf, or human...or even Valar or Maiar)... who actually determines to: 1) - receive 2) - listen 3) - ponder 4) - research further 5) - consider again 6) - reform a perspective, and 7) - change.
Predominantly what we have is: 1) - receive 2) - compare to preference 3) - accept if agreement 4) - reject if disagreement. And there the story ends... intractability is already set in, and we need to grasp we are dealing with an entity in which the irresistible force and the unmoveable object have intentionally and unbreakably blended together to insure an unassailable position--yes, regardless of the 'facts'.
The Religion of Opinion has its doctrinal statement and membership criteria just like any other religion.
I shall be happy to present them upon request. (They are currently in revision but will be available soon.)
NOTE: this post will shortly be assailed by some who disagree with it: in spite of the facts.
Ent most likely uses his term "The Religion of Opinion" as shorthand for the way some people put forth their opinions with a religious, perhaps better dogmatic zeal. The opinions he means need not have anything to do with actual religion.I got the impression that we are not supposed to talk about religion on this forum, but at least in my circles, I have both had and witnessed many fruitful religious discussions. That said, I agree there are some people with "hardened hearts", as it were, to use religious terminology.
Simply put, we aren't. Olorgando, "who has a way of hitting the nail with his head" (Paul Harvey) describes how I employ it accurately.we are not supposed to talk about religion on this forum
Best here is "intractably entrenched zeal."perhaps better dogmatic zeal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?