• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Who would win, Smaug or a Balrog

Who would win

  • Smaug

    Votes: 26 47.3%
  • a Balrog

    Votes: 29 52.7%

  • Total voters
    55
Since Dragons are generaly stronger than Balrogs, id say Smaug. But it depends wich Balrog we're talking about. If it was any ol' balrog id say Smaug definately. If it was Gothmog, i'd say it would be a VERY good fight.

Good thread;)
 
Think....A balrog is a Maia, a godly being. It doesn't die when you kill its body. A dragon dies when its body is slain. Clearly, without a doubt a balrog would win.
 
There have been so many threads like this one...and in each one I've been in favour of the Balrogs. No difference here.
 
Gate7ole, it's your 1000th post AND you agree with me. This sure is a special occasion.:D

What does everyone think: could a dragon put a spell on a Balrog, much as Glaurung put a spell on Turin by looking him in the eyes.
 
While I voted for the Balrog, I've begun thinking. If an Elf can kill a Balrog, doesn't that suggest that the battle between a dragon and a Balrog might not be as clear cut as one might initially think? Just an idle musing...
 
I voted for A balrog. Due to Darwin's theory.

Smaug was a rare dragon. one left from long ago. one of the last, i believe.

Balrogs were feirceom (sp?) and hard to defeat.

over the history of fairy tales you hear of the defeat of dragons. therefore we can conclude that they were easier killed than balrogs cause you never hear of people killing balrogs cause they never tried cause it was too hard.

ok. so there are a lot of loopholes in that theory, but it is my theory none the less.
 
Originally posted by FoolOfATook
If an Elf can kill a Balrog, doesn't that suggest that the battle between a dragon and a Balrog might not be as clear cut as one might initially think?

There were three battles occuring with Balrogs:

- Glorfindel vs. a Balrog: both perished
- Echtelion vs. Gothmog: both perished
- Gandalf vs. a Balrog: both perished

There were four battles with Dragons:

- Turin vs. Glaurung: Turin killed the dragon without dying himself
- Eärendil vs. Ancalagon: Eärendil killed the dragon
- Fram vs. Scatha: Fram killed the dragon
- Bard vs. Smaug: Bard killed the dragon

Can any conclusion be made from this? The Balrogs fought with two Eldar and a Maia, and all of them perished in the fight.
The Dragons fought with three men and a half-elf and none of the latter died in combat.
Do I really have to say it out loud? The Balrogs would win over dragons any day!;)
 
ithrynluin- don't get me wrong, I agree that a Balrog could take a dragon. I was just speculating, idly. I hadn't thought about the fates of various dragons, but you're absolutely right.
 
Originally posted by FoolOfATook
1. Where is it established that dragons are more powerful than Balrogs? Because, several people here seem to believe otherwise...

From Characters From Tolkein, by David Day
Of all Melkor's creatures, only Dragons were greater in power.

Now, even if this is not true, Smaug was the last of the GREAT dragons. Im not sure how great they are, but that title must mean something. And if it was Smaug, a great Dragon against any old Balrog, i'd say Smaug would win.
 
Come on Morgulking, you should know better than to try to use David Day as proof. His stuff has several mistakes....and even if it didn't, it's still not Tolkien.

Now, even if this is not true, Smaug was the last of the GREAT dragons. Im not sure how great they are, but that title must mean something. And if it was Smaug, a great Dragon against any old Balrog, i'd say Smaug would win.

Smaug is any old dragon cuz... he's nuthin special really...

....
 

Similar threads

Back
Top